25 Oct CHEMICAL CONVERSION MATERIALS FOR COATING ALUMINUM AND ALUMINUM ALLOYS (SUPERSEDING MIL-DTLA). MIL-DTLB(AMENDMENT1) Chemical Conversion Materials for Coating Aluminum and Aluminum , Download. MIL-DTLB Chemical Conversion Materials For Coating Aluminum And Aluminum Alloys Document Status Active Information and documents presented .

Author: Doulmaran Mazuru
Country: Chile
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 5 April 2008
Pages: 26
PDF File Size: 4.11 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.53 Mb
ISBN: 748-7-58710-396-4
Downloads: 19008
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fekora

The AMS spec is currently used by several aerospace manufacturers, and as such, you would be required to conform to the 81706g of that spec. The “DTL” is indeed short for “detail”, and was done to reflect the move away from ‘how-to’ type specifications, to one that merely lists the important details of the requirements.

Comments containing profanity will be deleted. Need more than one copy? Information and documents presented here are works of the U. Receive monthly updates on new spreadsheets, additions to the Technical Library, Market News and Information, exclusive content and more.

I hope that someone can help us out. Comments that attack an individual person or group will be deleted. If you have any reference material that you would like to see included in the library we would love to hear from you.

MIL-DTLB – Chemical Conversion Materials For Coating Aluminum And Aluminum Alloys

Already Subscribed to this document. However, there are some instances where comments will be edited or deleted. Links to non-relevant content are not allowed and will be removed or the comment deleted. Your email address will be kept confidential.


Cancel Reply 87106b are moderated and will not be published until approved.

(PDF) MIL-DTL-81706B Datasheet download

This comment policy is subject to change at anytime. Please first log in with a verified email before subscribing to alerts.

January 10, A. We have no amendments or corrections for this standard. Ray Kremer Stellar Solutions, Inc. Hey, at least they upped the revision letter!


All the chemicals used are identical. I’ve been researching for a definitive answer as my company must list the accurate specification on our conformance certificate. I have to say I’m not certain of the difference between a ‘detail’ specification and a ‘performance’ specification such as MIL-PRF [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.

Government and are not subject to copyright protection in the U. Janiece, if the NADCAP folks insist on playing jil games, they should know that Mil-CE is a correct, current, and active document for chemical conversion coating on aluminum and aluminum alloys.

Good luck and get back to us if I have misunderstood the situation. I find no reference that this has actually happened. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed 81706bb will be deleted.

It’s been a confusing few years as it seems that the feds were trying to move specs from the Mil system to AMS standards, Billie.


All information presented is for general reference and etl not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author’s employer. Though obviously everybody should be looking at revision F rather than the older copies.

TOP Related Articles  ID10T FORM PDF

Market Analysis and Market Information Our newest addition to the library is an on-going series of articles on the aircraft and aerospace market.

Joseph, Probably the answer you are looking for is from Lee Gearhart up near the top of the page from I think the right “update” for Mil-C [link by ed. Although it might be unlikely that there would be any reaction between the two materials, who would want to be on the hook to have to prove it if anywhere down the line the component had trouble of any sort, related or unrelated?

Standards Subsctiption may be the perfect solution.

Supplier companies like Henkel, Macdermid, Chemetall [a finishing. Proceed to Checkout Continue Shopping. Kansas City, Missouri A. Can iml shed light on this? March 28, A. Is there a technical concern if my part were to have been dhl chemical conversion coated with type 1 material and then touched-up in small areas with type II material where there was mechanical damage to the part that required metal to be removed to flatten out a dent and remove a burr?